Y
The Ye Archive
v0.8
H
FIG. 10 · METHODOLOGY

Methodology

Understanding how Ye Archive evaluates records, source claims, and confidence.

01 / 08

Music-first spine

Music remains the primary organizing spine of the archive. All other domain layers—fashion, brand, product, business, visuals, live events, sources, and eras—exist to provide temporal and thematic context to the music catalog.

02 / 08

Schema V1 structure

The archive uses a structured data model (Schema V1) to ensure every entity is citeable. This allows us to track explicit relationships between tracks, albums, people, and their production context.

03 / 08

Field-level provenance

Unlike traditional archives, we track evidence at the field level. A track title, release date, or role can have its own source claim. Some fields are fully validated, while others are still being mapped from our legacy dataset.

04 / 08

Source claims

Every archive fact is supported by a source claim. We rely on explicit IDs and direct source attribution rather than loose text matching or manual inference.

05 / 08

Confidence levels

We assign confidence states to data points. We believe transparency is better than hidden ambiguity, especially for unreleased or rumored material.

06 / 08

Unreleased material

Unreleased, leaked, demo, and alternate records are treated as metadata-only entries. They carry lower confidence labels unless supported by primary, high-tier documentation.

07 / 08

Content safety

The archive does not host copyrighted audio, leak files, unauthorized media, or download links. We are a research-focused metadata repository.

08 / 08

Current limitations

Data coverage is expanding. You may find gaps in provenance or incomplete entity linking as we continue to migrate and validate the full dataset.

CONFIDENCE RANKING

Source confidence definitions

Confirmed (Rank: 4)
Official releases, primary documentation, or direct first-party archive references.
Documented (Rank: 3)
Credible secondary sourcing or durable public documentation.
Community (Rank: 2)
Widely tracked community knowledge that remains reviewable.
Rumored (Rank: 1)
Plausible but unresolved leads that should not be asserted as fact.
Unverified (Rank: 0)
Unknown or insufficiently sourced metadata retained only as a placeholder.